As to the deck itself, I think you're a bit low on influence for the high-influence cost events you're running; I know you have the Maesters in there to round out the location-based influence, but I don't like relying on character-based influence. Cutting the Prince's Plans keeps your 4-cost events to four total.
I like Greedy Councilor, but don't think it's so amazing that you need three. I know Samwell is your main draw engine as far as actual draw , but between TVB and the Septa, I'm thinking you should be fine as far as that.
Another cut option would be to lose all three of the Councilors and either the Prince's Plans or one Black Raven two should be quite enough. Your character count, especially in a recursion-based deck, seems a bit high, so I don't think you'd miss the Councilors, although they do make excellent Ally-hate bait. Just to make sure: You can't discard Darkstar if you want to actually trigger Open Market, because he wouldn't be successfully discarded, right? But you can attempt to trigger it, and discard him, when you want to put him into play for free, am I correct?
But that's only because for some reason I really like this card and want it to be viable in some deck. How frequently are you actually able to get TVB out?
Between running 3 of them and running 3 Burned Men not to mention one TRV , I see you struggling badly for resources here unless I'm missing an obvious trick. Shenanigans- I did actually have the Lannister Seas in the deck to begin with as another source of influence, but, wound up cutting them in my efforts to trim the deck down from the 84 it started at.
I'd agree that overall, location based influence is more sturdy, but having the multiple maesters to search for has been pretty solid for me in decks that wanted a similar level of influence.
I will admit, however, that upping the 0 cost non-limited locations would be a huge boon to setups, so it's something that could be looked at. Aside from that, I could get with you in spirit on some of those reductions. Dropping one Prince's Plans lightens up on the influence requirements and is still likely to be seen with enough regularity to be worthwhile.
Likewise, dropping one Black Raven probably still leaves us sitting pretty, considering the capability to search with the plot. Honestly, what I'm considering cutting, however, is Hidden Vale Pass. While I like the idea of jumping in some surprise deadly with one of the Clansmen, I'm a little worried that it just doesn't have enough overall impact to warrant the slots. As far as the Open Market knows, he was still discarded, but his own text just changes the location where he goes as a result of that discard.
I've also been looking for a good home for Hugor Hill. JCWamma, There is the potential for income difficulties, I admit. I wouldn't at all be expecting to play any two of those cards that you mentioned together, but I think it shouldn't be terribly hard to get one TVB in play with 4 four gold plots in the rotation.
On those turns, it only takes 3 more gold to play them, and since we want a Black Raven ASAP to activate Open Market, it's more likely that we only need 2 more gold.
There are several gold producers and some reducers in the deck, and I think you'd be surprised at how often at least 1 Sea is going to be in the 4 cards that you get back with Prince's Plans.
This means that it can be used much more frequently to reduce costs. As well, I think you're not going to have to keep playing characters at a particularly high rate due to the capability to keep bringing back Red Vengeance.
Using it repeatedly eliminates the normal board attrition that most of us face in our games, and in fact, doubles to potential attrition that opponents are undergoing. Observation Point BoRF. Not sure how to fit it in but that would be sweet to get recurring. Won't lie, I completely forgot about a the fact that it's summer for the deck, and b.
That makes it a lot better than I was imagining! That said, surely the attrition negated by Red Vengeance will be then made back up again from Westeros Bleeds? It's been a while since I've read the book, but how about, how does he know how to talk without social peers? He can tap phone lines, sure, but that ought just be noise to somebody who doesn't even have a concept of language. Yeah, they were, but the biggest issue would not be taking them to their logical conclusion, it would be trying to make them work in the first place.
Oh, sure, physical harm might be easy, but what other forms of harm are there? Of course, this wouldn't set him up for talking in English, but his intelligence was soon discovered by the local repair-map after he paid a cleaner 10 trillion credits over what he should have done. I'm sure prescience could tell you more, but he doesn't seem to be around anymore. I just had an interesting thought.
One of the major ways of optimizing is to turn algorithms into recursive functions. Maybe you could have an AI character that thinks in terms of recursion not easy but you know it'd be interesting. Well, a recursive function isn't necessarily better than any other, and the computer doesn't have infinite stack space.
In most environments, nested calls around deep will break something. Right, I forgot about that Programming a computer to "understand" a human-usable language would probably result in an AGI anyway. And Yej, all the cool kids use tail recursion.
Or more seriously, recursion that deep doesn't usually come up outside of math problems and stuff. He died at the end, got lobotomised by a surgical missile strike, and even after they hooked everything back up he never came alive again. The main reason recursion is actually used is that in a lot of cases, it leads to more elegant and readable code.
However, there is no difference from the machine's point of view. Heh, I didn't mean for you guys to interpret recursion being itself the optimization but that optimized formulas in a lot of cases are recursive solutions. We express them in iterative format for good coding practices. Like, bubble versus merge sort. Anyway, author thinks my idea is too esoteric I'll think of something else.
I would always figure that the AI character would be really good at a few things but really bad at others. For instance if the AI were a soldier, it'd be a brilliant strategist, marksman etc but terrible at understanding civilian life. A teenage boy got into a car accident and his brain was completely destroyed.
His parents donated his body to a research laboratory that installed an AI brain in him. So this character has a human body, but a mechanical brain. The main plot is that he and two psychic kids The Empath protagonist and a Seer have to flee when terrorists attack the lab. They team up with two other kids and take down the guys who did it. Community Showcase More. Follow TV Tropes. You need to login to do this. Get Known if you don't have an account. Oct 5th at PM I have an idea to create an AI character who is roughly human-level in intelligence, but has realistic computer-style strengths and weaknesses.
Oct 5th at PM Well it depends what kind of sensors it's hooked up to, these days there are computers stat can just about recognise your face moving through a crowd at an airport, so I wouldn't say sensory processing would be particularly weak. Oct 5th at PM It's a difficult question. What kind of physical structure are we talking here?
Camera network? Oct 5th at PM I dabble in AI myself as a hobby, not that I'm some guy working to put us into a singularist but the first question you should ask because I find this an issue with everybody who portrays AI Oct 5th at PM Hey, he posited nothing about now they work or not much anyway , but Mike was at least as plausible as any 'accidental AI' before or since.
Oct 5th at PM Well it's more or less a vehicle for someone who thinks different from the society of the author so they can reflect on some stuff. Oct 5th at PM given that all we seem to get these days are Asimov type robots. Oct 5th at PM Heinlein is a hard sci-fi writer, her can hit level 5 or 6.
Oct 5th at PM Yeah, well most of Heinlein novels were more about his crazy social views that went from being a hippy to a fascist dictator. Oct 6th at AM Well at least he didn't go for Asimov's Three Laws, those are absolutely poisonous define 'human', define 'harm', then try to work in criminal laws, no wonder VIKI from the 'I, Robot' movie was so friggin stuffed up.
Oct 6th at AM I object to Heinlein's views being called fascist. More like giant cherries. What does "AGI" mean?
Oct 6th at AM Yeah, they were, but the biggest issue would not be taking them to their logical conclusion, it would be trying to make them work in the first place. Oct 8th at PM I just had an interesting thought. So a recursive function is one that calls itself repeatedly to solve a problem.
Yej See ALL the stars!
0コメント