The fourth hijacked plane was crashed into a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania that killed 40 more. A plane flying from Boston to Los Angeles with 92 people on board, including five hijackers, was crashed into the North Tower of the World Trade Center at am local time.
An hour and 42 minutes after the impact, the North Tower collapsed, releasing a huge cloud of dust and smoke. At am local time , another plane with 65 people on board — including five hijackers — hit the South Tower, sparking a massive explosion and collapsed 56 minutes later.
Source: AFP. Besides the twin towers, a storey third tower, known as Tower Seven, was also collapsed after seven hours on the same day. The then published reports had claimed that building fires were growing and spreading throughout the multiple floors, which became the ultimate reason for the collapse of the buildings.
But the answer becomes clear once you consider the details. Aircraft are made from lightweight materials, such as aluminium. If you compare the mass of an aircraft with that of a skyscraper more than metres tall and built from steel and concrete, it makes sense the building would not topple over. That said, the aircraft did dislodge fireproofing material within the towers, which was coated on the steel columns and on the steel floor trusses underneath concrete slabs.
The lack of fireproofing left the steel unprotected. As such, the impact also structurally damaged the supporting steel columns. When a few columns become damaged, the load they carry is transferred to other columns.
These theories have developed from video footage showing the towers rapidly collapsing downwards some time after impact, similar to a controlled demolition. But it is possible for them to have collapsed this way without explosives. It was fire that caused this. And the fire is believed to have come from the burning of remaining aircraft fuel. According to the FEMA report, fire within the buildings caused thermal expansion of the floors in a horizontal and outwards direction, pushing against the rigid steel columns — which deflected to an extent but resisted further movement.
Approximately three hours after that order was given, WTC 7 collapsed. About people raised their hands. Thank you, to all of you for being so focused. Common sense says that random fires can not possibly bring a steel frame building down symmetrically at near free fall speed.
Thousands of dollars are being spent to prove the obvious and dozens of people are having to jump through hoops because of a criminal cover-up. Not many want to accept the fact that the high-rise architects and engineers know what they are doing, that fires generally will stay on the floor they started on. Hopefully will be the year that this story from finally breaks. Thank you for reporting this. A refreshing bit of courageous journalism despite the nearly two decades conspiracy of silence.
Amidst our current global uncertainties, we must seek truth and integrity to ensure freedom and justice, it is the birthright of our humanity. There is so much proof that this is true.
And yet we sit and except it as normal. What have we become? This may be a bit extreme, however, until the reasons can be validated as to how an object that is not in motion can have an amount of inertia to move in downward and outward at free fall, in a pyroclastic cloud of dust and the ejection of thousands of tons of steel sideways well over feet, that all building must come to an end and the subject of physics must be suspended.
I am ashamed of science in general as it has become a perverse form of modeling using false assumptions and reverse engineered outcomes that are not possible nor repeatable using what we used to know as the scientific method. Thank you for this.
Yes, thank you for your fearless journalism! The truth necessarily should set The People freaked! But free nonetheless. Thanks for publishing this! On September 11, , the world witnessed the total collapse of three large steel-framed high-rises. Since then, scientists and engineers have been working to understand why and how these unprecedented structural failures occurred.
If one of my students had written either of the NIST reports not only would I have failed them but I would also have had them thrown out of my programme for serious violation of research ethics both in fabrication and falsification of evidence together with failure to supply sufficient information for me to be able to reproduce their results which is an essential requirement for any scientific report.
There are two hypotheses on offer — Fire and Controlled Demolition. Dr Hulsey and his colleagues have demonstrated that it was not fire. Then after the building collapsed, where was the evidence of all the steel having been cut. Cutting steel columns leaves the ends of columns cut and it would be obvious to any one of the hundreds of people on the site afterwards.
Thank you for this article. Thank you for doing your jobs as journalists. The only respectable news website on the internet who has reported on this. The ownership and those in charge of security at the WTC complex are the prime suspects.
Why am I not surprised such fair coverage came from a Canadian institution rather than one from the US, with its misguided penchant to support Amnerican exceptionalism. This is awesome news but the Sheople are still in passive mode, waiting to be told what to think or how to respond to a yet complicit mainstream media determined to keep them in the dark and under established, corporate control.
They shame all of us. It should come with their jobs and commitment to science. But they are, alas, meek and afraid; to stand up to whom? The truth is not nearly so fragile as they would like us to believe. The truth will stand up to any and all questioning. An excellent article — thank you. The UAF report makes intersting reading and follows thorough investigation of mutliple failure scenario possibilities to find those that fit the best.
Importantly their dynamic analysis of the controlled demolition scenario produces a visual collapse that perfectly matches that seen in the video evidence from that fateful day — something the NIST investigation completely failed to do.
Make money for Richard Gage. This report is to energize the base, and get donations flowing, nothing more. I really enjoyed your article. This creates a paradox in which no one will listen to you if no one will listen to you.
Well thank you Mr. Harvey for listening. As an architect I am following this matter for the last 19 years. This information has been out there all the time. I am happy to see that despite all the time the process of finding the truth is still progressing.
Same will happen to the COVID 19 happenings, which are disputed by scientists and medical practitioners all over the world. Actions speak louder than words. Yet, what we hear from world leaders concerning Civil engineering students at the University of Victoria in B. Canada will face a shortage of at least 10, workers in nationally recognized Economists offered contrasting visions of the construction marketplace in t Pre-Bid Projects. Click here for free access to Conceptual and Planning stage projects from across Canada.
Recent Comments 98 comments comments for this post are closed John Hort May 20, Sandra Jay May 20, Jonathan Cole May 20, Scott Grainger May 20, Roland Angle May 20, Randy Hancock May 20, Daniel May 20, David Fura May 20, Graham May 20, Scott Bonnett May 20, Gary Weglarz May 20, Brent Bolton May 20, James Reinhart May 20, Jeffrey May 20, Meredith Vuylsteke May 20, Dennis Tucker May 20, Todd Marshall May 20, Nick May 20, Roger Soares May 20, Lester Grant May 20, Dingwall May 20, Douglas Jack May 20, Nancy Withington May 20, Anthony Jarana May 20, Allan Stroem, Norway May 20, Jim May 20, Martin Hawes May 20, Paul Rousset May 20, Colin Doran May 20, Brian Harry, Australia May 21, Mumin May 21, Robert Anderson May 21, Matt May 21, Xander May 21, Jeremy Beck May 21, Simon Oakden May 21, Micha Kuiper, the Netherlands May 21, Johnsa May 21, Edgar D.
Rocha May 21, Ben Thomas May 21, Gerald Carpenter May 21, Derek Main May 21, Sybil May 21, Marcus Jones May 21, Jamie Cronin May 21, Leslie Czar May 21, Adrian Mallett May 21, Mimi May 21, David Pidcock May 21, Jack Williams May 21,
0コメント